Heading into the final stretch of the college season, the 2026 NBA Draft picture has come into clearer focus. Long viewed as one of the deepest classes in years, the group continues to deliver, with Darryn Peterson moving ahead of AJ Dybantsa over the past couple of months after showing the highest long-term upside. ACC freshman bigs Cameron Boozer and Caleb Wilson have also strengthened their standing while carrying their respective teams, and the board is beginning to stabilize as production separates prospects from projections, with guards like Kingston Flemings, Mikel Brown, and Keaton Wagler rising through efficiency, control, and leadership. With 20 freshmen projected in the first round, this update reflects a stronger snapshot of an incredibly talented class taking shape.
6’5”, 195, PG/SG, Kansas, Fr.
2025–26 Stats: 13 GP, 20.5 PPG, 48.9 FG%, 41.9 3P%, 79.1 FT%, 4.2 RPG, 1.7 APG, 1.3 SPG, 0.5 BPG, 1.6 TO
Peterson is an incredibly dynamic scoring guard whose blend of burst, strength, and shot-making has translated whenever he has been on the floor. He features a quick first step, deep pull-up range, and the ability to score at all three levels, consistently putting pressure on defenses both on and off the ball. Even with limited minutes and availability, he has produced efficiently, flashing the type of offensive gravity that warps coverages. His positional size and power are further enhanced by an extraordinary 8’7” standing reach, giving him rare physical advantages for a combo guard and legitimate two-way versatility.
Limited to just over half of Kansas’ games due to leg issues and cramping, Peterson has been managed on something of a snap count, which has slightly complicated evaluations. Even so, his impact has been undeniable, highlighted by a clutch performance against Texas Tech in which he buried two late three-pointers to seal the win. The durability questions are the only factor giving some scouts brief pause, but when healthy, Peterson has separated himself as the most explosive and scalable offensive talent in the class. A player we rated No. 2 long before the consensus caught up, he now projects as a franchise-level guard and the current favorite to be selected first overall in the 2026 NBA Draft.
NBA Comparison: James Harden / Devin Booker
2. Atlanta Hawks (from New Orleans) – AJ Dybantsa
6’9”, 210, SF/PF, BYU, Fr.
2025–26 Stats: 23 GP, 24.0 PPG, 54.0 FG%, 37.8 3P%, 74.9 FT%, 6.3 RPG, 3.5 APG, 1.1 SPG, 0.4 BPG, 2.8 TO
Dybantsa has been one of the most consistent and dominant players in college basketball all season, combining elite physical tools with a steadily expanding offensive skill set. A fluid, explosive athlete, he currently leads the nation in scoring at 24.0 points per game while carrying a primary offensive role with strong efficiency. His length, anticipation, and motor translate defensively, where he rotates with purpose, disrupts passing lanes, and holds his own across multiple positions. Offensively, he continues to operate as a true point forward, handling comfortably, initiating sets, and creating opportunities for teammates with improving vision and composure.
While his perimeter shooting was inconsistent early, his overall efficiency has climbed, and he has developed a highly reliable mid-range package featuring turnaround jumpers, pull-ups, and dribble counters to create separation against slower defenders. He attacks downhill with power and balance, finishes above the rim, rebounds his position, and seamlessly shifts between scoring and facilitating roles. Pushed by the rise of Darryn Peterson at the top of the board, Dybantsa has responded with steady, high-level production, reinforcing his profile as a franchise-caliber talent with perennial All-Star upside and rare multi-positional versatility.
NBA Comparison: Tracy McGrady
6’10”, 250, PF, Duke, Fr.
2025–26 Stats: 23 GP, 23.3 PPG, 57.6 FG%, 38.0 3P%, 76.2 FT%, 10.0 RPG, 4.0 APG, 1.8 SPG, 0.5 BPG, 2.3 TO
Boozer has been one of the steadiest and most dominant players in college basketball all season, combining strength, touch, motor, and elite fundamentals in a way that consistently translates to winning. A physically ready freshman, he is averaging 23.3 points and 10.0 rebounds per game while operating comfortably as a face-up scorer, interior finisher, and offensive hub. While he is not an explosive athlete, his feel for the game is exceptional, allowing him to score efficiently, exploit mismatches, and stretch the floor with improved three-point shooting. He is an advanced passer for his position, making quick reads out of doubles and consistently finding cutters and shooters, and his production, consistency, and impact have made him the current odds-on favorite for National Player of the Year.
Defensively, Boozer is sturdy and disciplined, holding his ground in the post, communicating well, and contesting shots with timing and positioning rather than vertical pop. His motor runs hot, and his rebounding reliability makes him a near automatic double-double threat. Some evaluators draw Tim Duncan–style comparisons based on his fundamentals and demeanor, but even a career trajectory similar to Al Horford, a former No. 3 pick and five-time All-Star, would represent an outstanding outcome. Boozer’s polish, consistency, and high floor make him one of the safest projections in the 2026 class, with long-term upside as a 20-and-10 caliber frontcourt anchor built on intelligence, toughness, and skill.
6’4”, 190, PG, Houston, Fr.
2025–26 Stats: 23 GP, 17.1 PPG, 51.6 FG%, 36.5 3P%, 82.6 FT%, 3.5 RPG, 5.4 APG, 1.8 SPG, 1.9 TO
Flemings has quickly emerged as one of the most impactful freshman lead guards in the country, pairing elite athleticism with improving efficiency and growing command of Houston’s offense. An explosive downhill creator with a tight handle and excellent burst, he consistently generates penetration and finishes above the rim with strength and creativity. His perimeter shooting has been an important development, knocking down mid-30s from three while forcing defenders to respect him off the ball and opening driving lanes where his speed and physicality become major weapons. He plays with confidence and edge as Houston’s primary initiator, showing comfort pulling up, collapsing defenses, and making timely reads out of ball screens.
Like most young high-usage guards, there are stretches where his aggressiveness leads to forced drives or ambitious decisions, but his assist-to-turnover numbers reflect encouraging control for a freshman. Continued strength gains will help him finish through contact and hold up defensively against older guards, though his quickness, competitiveness, and activity already allow him to pressure the ball and create disruption. Flemings’ rapid development has pushed him firmly into the upper lottery conversation, and with Houston competing at a national-title level, his leadership, shot creation, and big-moment poise continue to strengthen his case as a long-term NBA lead guard with speed, scoring punch, and playmaking versatility.
NBA Comparison: De’Aaron Fox
6’10”, 215, PF, North Carolina, Fr.
2025–26 Stats: 23 GP, 20.2 PPG, 9.6 RPG, 2.8 APG, 58.5 FG%, 26.9 3P%, 71.4 FT%, 1.3 BPG, 1.6 SPG
Wilson has established himself as one of the most reliable and consistently productive freshmen in the country, delivering efficient scoring and strong interior presence on a nightly basis. A fluid, bouncy forward with excellent size and mobility, he plays with a relentless motor and continues to impact games as both a rim runner and face-up threat. Now physically stronger at 6’10”, 215 pounds, he finishes above the rim with ease, thrives as a lob target, and has expanded his ability to score off the dribble with improved comfort attacking closeouts and creating when plays break down.
While his three-point percentage indicates continued development is needed as a perimeter shooter, the touch and mechanics suggest room for growth. His improved frame allows him to absorb contact, rebound effectively, and defend multiple positions, giving him legitimate two-way versatility. Wilson consistently creates mismatches with his size, mobility, and activity level, and his competitiveness shows up possession after possession. With steady production, defensive impact, and a clear upward trajectory, he has solidified his standing as a top-five talent in the 2026 class and one of the safest high-end prospects entering the stretch run.
NBA Comparison: Jermaine O’Neal / Chris Bosh
6’4”, 190, PG, Louisville, Fr.
Stats (16 GP): 17.2 PPG, 3.3 RPG, 5.1 APG, 39.8 FG%, 31.4 3P%, 81.9 FT%
Brown remains one of the most skilled and intriguing lead guards in the 2026 class, controlling tempo with poise and playing with a quiet confidence that shows in his decision-making. More quick and shifty than outright fast, he excels at creating separation with change of pace, hesitation moves, and tight ball handling. He generates offense efficiently out of ball screens, where his pull-up shooting and shot creativity stand out. His signature performance came in Louisville’s win over NC State, where he exploded for 45 points and knocked down 10-of-16 from three, reinforcing the elite shot-making ability and scoring ceiling that made him such a highly regarded prospect. His mechanics, touch, and shot difficulty profile suggest his perimeter efficiency should continue trending upward.
Durability remains the key variable in Brown’s evaluation. Back issues that have lingered over the past three seasons have limited his availability at times, making medical evaluations a focal point for NBA teams. He has had stretches where staying on the floor has been a challenge, and how he finishes the season will play a major role in determining his draft range. Even so, his 6’7” wingspan, advanced handle, and playmaking instincts allow him to create quality looks for himself and others. If his health stabilizes and the shooting consistency holds, Brown carries one of the highest offensive ceilings in the class and could emerge as one of the draft’s best value selections if medical concerns cause some teams to hesitate.
NBA Comparison: Darius Garland / Trae Young
7. Dallas Mavericks – Nate Ament
6’10”, 205, SF/PF, Tennessee, Fr.
2025–26 Stats: 23 GP, 17.6 PPG, 6.5 RPG, 2.5 APG, 42.8 FG%, 33.3 3P%, 76.8 FT%
Ament is a smooth, fluid forward whose combination of size, mobility, and perimeter skill makes him one of the more intriguing long-term prospects in the freshman class. At 6’10” with natural coordination and a clean shooting stroke, he fits the modern NBA mold as a big wing/forward capable of spacing the floor and attacking closeouts. His production has grown as his role has expanded, and he’s shown the ability to score at multiple levels while contributing on the glass and flashing connective passing ability. His long strides and body control allow him to cover ground easily in transition and create offense off angled drives, while his comfort playing off the ball helps him generate efficient opportunities within the flow.
The next step in his development is adding strength, physicality, and greater offensive assertiveness. He can still be knocked off spots by stronger defenders, and continuing to improve his ability to create separation and produce consistently in the half court will be important to maximizing his upside. As his frame fills out and his confidence grows, his length, shooting touch, and mobility should become more impactful on both ends. Defensively, he shows encouraging versatility, using his reach and movement skills to contest shots and guard multiple positions, even as his technique and consistency continue to develop. With continued physical growth and expanded self-creation, Ament projects as a high-upside stretch forward with significant long-term two-way potential.
NBA Comparison: Jonathan Isaac / Lamar Odom
6’6”, 195, SG, USC, Fr.
2025–26 Stats: 6 GP, 13.8 PPG, 2.8 RPG, 1.2 APG, 35.4 FG%, 27.6 3P%, 65.4 FT%
Arenas entered college as one of the most naturally gifted scoring guards in the freshman class, but his season has been shaped more by recovery than rhythm. A torn meniscus suffered in July, combined with the aftereffects of injuries from a serious car accident in April 2025, has limited both his availability and continuity. The inconsistent shooting splits reflect rust and limited game reps, but the underlying talent has still surfaced in flashes, including a 29-point outing against Indiana that reminded scouts of his advanced shot-making instincts, confidence, and ability to generate offense at all three levels.
Prior to the injuries, Arenas was viewed as a mid-lottery talent thanks to his deep range, natural scoring feel, and versatility as a combo guard capable of creating both on and off the ball. His pre-injury film shows a dynamic offensive weapon with burst, polished pull-up ability, and strong off-ball instincts. Durability and missed development time will be central to his evaluation, with teams placing heavy emphasis on medicals and late-season progress. If he regains rhythm and confidence, the long-term upside remains significant. Whether he declares or opts for another year will be a key decision, but if he enters the draft, Arenas profiles as a high-risk, high-reward talent whose ceiling still far exceeds his current production.
NBA Comparison: Latrell Sprewell / Jamal Crawford
6’6”, 185, PG/SG, Illinois, Fr.
2025–26 Stats: 24 GP, 17.8 PPG, 5.1 RPG, 4.2 APG, 45.9 FG%, 43.3 3P%, 80.9 FT%
Wagler has been one of the biggest surprises in college basketball this season, rising from a lightly regarded recruit to one of the most productive and intriguing freshmen in the country. Despite a narrow frame and plenty of physical development still ahead, he plays with advanced poise, confidence, and a scorer’s instinct that belies his experience. His 46-point explosion against Purdue served as a defining performance, highlighting his deep range, shot-making versatility, and ability to take over against high-level competition. What he lacks in strength or explosiveness, he compensates for with pace, craft, and a mature understanding of how to control the game.
His appeal as a prospect lies in the blend of elite shooting, feel, and decision-making. Wagler knocks down over 43 percent from three, spaces the floor naturally, and makes quick, accurate reads as both a scorer and facilitator, rarely forcing the action. He impacts the game even when defenses key on him, showing strong composure and efficiency for a freshman carrying a major offensive role. The next step will be proving he can consistently create separation and handle increased physicality against elite athletes, but the offensive foundation and basketball IQ are clear. With added strength and experience, Wagler has positioned himself as one of the most intriguing guard prospects in the 2026 class, offering a high-skill profile with legitimate long-term NBA upside.
NBA Comparison: Tyrese Halburton
6’6”, 190, SG, UConn, Fr.
2025–26 Stats: 17 GP, 11.7 PPG, 3.3 RPG, 1.4 APG, 47.4 FG%, 38.4 3P%, 81.3 FT%
Mullins has put together a strong freshman campaign, showing a polished foundation built around feel, length, and efficient perimeter shooting. At 6’6” with a long wingspan and solid athleticism, he offers an ideal physical profile for an NBA wing. His clean mechanics translate both off the catch and on the move, and his near-40 percent three-point shooting reflects natural touch and confidence spacing the floor. Playing within structure and making quick, unselfish decisions, he has steadily earned a larger role as his consistency and offensive confidence have grown throughout the season.
Defensively, Mullins’ tools have been equally encouraging. His length, lateral mobility, and competitiveness allow him to guard multiple perimeter positions while generating activity in passing lanes and contributing across the stat sheet. Continued strength development will be important as he adjusts to physical matchups and improves his ability to finish through contact. Even so, his combination of size, athleticism, defensive upside, and reliable outside shooting gives him a highly intriguing long-term profile. With continued growth and expanded offensive assertiveness, Mullins projects as a versatile two-way wing whose value is anchored by his perimeter shooting and positional flexibility.
NBA Comparison: Mike Dunleavy
6’4”, 185, PG/SG, Arizona, Fr.
2025–26 Stats: 24 GP, 15.7 PPG, 4.7 RPG, 2.6 APG, 50.8 FG%, 38.1 3P%, 78.8 FT%
Burries has established himself as one of the most productive and efficient freshman guards in the country, steadily growing into a larger role on an undefeated Arizona team. A strong, controlled combo guard, he plays with excellent pace and balance, scoring efficiently at all three levels while making smart decisions with the ball. His efficiency numbers reflect mature shot selection and a strong understanding of how to play within the flow of an offense, and he has proven comfortable operating both on and off the ball. Burries has been especially effective of late, highlighted by a 29-point performance against BYU that underscored his confidence and ability to shoulder offensive responsibility when needed.
Beyond his scoring, Burries brings consistent two-way value. He competes defensively, uses his strength and instincts to stay connected on the perimeter, and impacts the game as a rebounder and secondary playmaker. His willingness to move the ball, make the right read, and elevate teammates adds to his overall effectiveness. Continuing to improve his ability to create separation against elite athletes will be an important next step, but his combination of efficiency, toughness, and feel has firmly positioned him as a rising guard prospect with long-term NBA rotation upside.
NBA Comparison: Jalen Suggs
12. Oklahoma City Thunder (from LA Clippers) – Chris Cenac
6’11”, 240, PF/C, Houston, Fr.
2025–26 Stats: 23 GP, 9.8 PPG, 7.7 RPG, 0.8 APG, 50.5 FG%, 37.5 3P%, 63.3 FT%
Cenac remains one of the more intriguing long-term big men in the class, offering a rare blend of size, mobility, and emerging perimeter skill for a 6’11” frontcourt prospect. His role within Houston’s structured system has kept his scoring numbers modest, but his impact shows up through energy plays, rebounding, and efficient finishing around the rim. He runs the floor extremely well, covers ground easily in transition, and plays above the rim as a vertical threat. The ability to step out and convert nearly 38 percent from three, along with flashes of face-up comfort, highlights the offensive upside that makes him such an appealing developmental prospect. His coordination and movement ability for his size allow him to operate comfortably in space and fit the profile of a modern floor-spacing big.
Consistency remains the primary developmental focus, as his production and overall impact can fluctuate while he continues adjusting to the physical and mental demands of the college level. Defensively, his mobility gives him legitimate switching potential and the ability to contest in space, though his timing, strength, and presence as a rim protector are still evolving. The combination of shooting flashes and athletic versatility is eye-catching, particularly for a player with his frame, and it is important to remember that frontcourt players often take longer to develop physically and skill-wise. With continued strength gains, improved defensive feel, and a more consistent role, Cenac projects as a high-upside modern big whose tools and skill trajectory give him significant long-term NBA potential.
NBA Comparison: Kel’el Ware
13. San Antonio Spurs (via Chicago) – Darius Acuff
6’3”, 190, PG, Arkansas, Fr.
Stats (23 GP): 20.5 PPG, 3.0 RPG, 6.3 APG, 49.0 FG%, 41.6 3P%, 77.9 FT%
Acuff has established himself as one of the most productive and assertive freshman lead guards in the country, averaging over 20 points and more than six assists while carrying a major offensive burden for Arkansas. A strong, physical guard with excellent pace control, he consistently pressures defenses by getting downhill, using his sturdy frame and tight handle to create separation, absorb contact, and generate quality looks. His confidence and command stand out, as he plays with the presence of a true floor leader who embraces late-game responsibility. The shooting has been a major strength, converting over 40 percent from three, which forces defenses to extend and opens driving lanes where his strength and change of speeds are most effective.
Equally impressive has been his efficiency as a decision-maker, posting a strong 6.3-to-2.0 assist-to-turnover ratio despite high usage. That level of control reflects growing maturity and his ability to balance scoring aggression with playmaking responsibilities. How he navigates the late-season stretch and postseason will be important in further validating his leadership and ability to elevate a team in high-leverage settings. Defensively, his physicality allows him to compete at the point of attack, though improving consistency navigating screens and containing quicker guards remains an area for growth. With his blend of size, toughness, shooting efficiency, and command of the offense, Acuff projects as a high-ceiling lead guard capable of generating paint pressure, creating late-clock offense, and organizing an NBA backcourt.
NBA Comparison: Isaiah Collier
6’4”, 185, PG, Alabama, So.
2025–26 Stats: 22 GP, 21.5 PPG, 3.5 RPG, 4.9 APG, 50.9 FG%, 39.1 3P%, 76.4 FT%
Philon has built on an impressive freshman campaign to become the first non-freshman off the board in this range, emerging as one of the most productive and dynamic guards in college basketball. Now averaging over 21 points per game in an expanded role, he combines good positional size with elite end-to-end speed and a strong first step to consistently pressure defenses. His added strength has improved his ability to absorb contact, while his tight handle and change-of-pace allow him to manipulate defenders and operate effectively in ball-screen situations. The three-point shooting has been a major step forward, climbing to nearly 40 percent and giving him a far more complete scoring profile.
The next phase of Philon’s development centers on decision-making efficiency, as his 2.8 turnovers per game reflect the challenges that come with high usage and aggressive playmaking. He can occasionally force reads or overextend possessions, and improving his control as a facilitator will be key to maximizing his value as a lead guard. Even so, his combination of speed, scoring punch, improved shooting, and offensive creation makes him one of the more intriguing backcourt prospects in the class. If the turnover rate stabilizes while the efficiency holds, Philon projects as a high-level offensive guard whose pace, craft, and shot-making translate well to the modern NBA.
NBA Comparison: Dennis Schröder
6’6”, 180, SG/SF, Duke, So.
Stats (23 GP): 14.0 PPG, 3.1 RPG, 1.3 APG, 40.7 FG%, 33.3 3P%, 88.3 FT%
Evans has continued his sophomore progression, showing improved confidence and offensive polish while solidifying his role as one of Duke’s primary perimeter scoring threats. A smooth, natural shot-maker, he has expanded beyond a spot-up role, adding a more reliable midrange pull-up, improved strength finishing through contact, and flashes of secondary shot creation. His length and high release allow him to generate clean looks over contests, and he moves efficiently without the ball, navigating screens and finding rhythm within the flow of the offense. His elite free-throw percentage reinforces the soft touch and shooting foundation that anchor his long-term value as a scoring wing.
The primary questions surrounding Evans center on his overall impact beyond scoring, as his current production in rebounding, playmaking, and physical presence remains modest. Continued strength development should help him broaden his contributions, particularly on the defensive end, where his length already allows him to contest shots and guard multiple perimeter positions. While he is naturally lean and likely to remain on the slender side, he has shown improved comfort handling physical play compared to last season. With his shooting ability, developing off-the-dribble game, and scoring instincts, Evans projects as a prototypical floor-spacing wing with long-term starting upside.
NBA Comparison: Brandon Ingram
16. Oklahoma City Thunder (via Miami) – Thomas Haugh
6’9”, 210, SF/PF, Florida, Jr.
Stats (23 GP): 17.8 PPG, 6.4 RPG, 2.0 APG, 47.6 FG%, 35.2 3P%, 74.0 FT%
Haugh has stepped comfortably into a significantly expanded role this season, establishing himself as a steady, high-minutes contributor while carrying a much larger offensive responsibility. Playing nearly 34 minutes per night, he has become one of the more reliable high-energy forwards in college basketball, producing efficiently while impacting multiple phases of the game. At 6’9”, he brings strong mobility and positional versatility, excelling as a cutter, transition finisher, and opportunistic scorer who operates effectively within the flow of the offense. His improved three-point shooting has added an important layer to his profile, helping stretch defenses and enhancing his overall offensive value.
Defensively, Haugh offers dependable multi-positional utility, switching across matchups, anticipating actions well, and competing with a consistent motor. His rebounding production and overall activity reflect a player capable of influencing possessions without needing touches. While he is not a primary shot creator and must prove his perimeter shooting holds over a full season, his experience, maturity, and role acceptance strengthen his projection from a readiness standpoint. Haugh’s motor, feel, and winning impact make him an appealing plug-and-play forward with a clear pathway to a long-term NBA rotation role.
NBA Comparison: David Lee
6’10”, 240, PF, Washington Fr.
Stats (21 GP): 17.5 PPG, 11.2 RPG, 1.5 APG, 54.2 FG%, 35.1 3P%, 75.9 FT%
Steinbach has established himself as one of the most productive and physically imposing freshman bigs in the country, consistently controlling the paint with his size, strength, and relentless motor. At 6’10”, 240 pounds, he plays with a mature interior presence, anchoring the glass and producing double-doubles with regularity. He runs the floor well for his size, carves out deep position early in possessions, and finishes through contact with touch and patience. His nightly production reflects a player who understands how to leverage his frame, compete physically, and impact winning through effort and consistency.
Offensively, Steinbach has added an important dimension by showing credible perimeter range, connecting on over 35 percent from three and forcing defenses to account for him beyond the paint. That inside-out scoring ability, paired with elite rebounding, gives him a well-rounded offensive foundation. He also flashes solid feel as a passer from the elbows and short rolls, helping keep the offense flowing. Defensively, he relies more on positioning, strength, and anticipation than vertical explosiveness, and improving lateral mobility and foot speed in space will be key as the level rises. Even so, his combination of physical maturity, consistent production, rebounding dominance, and emerging shooting touch points to a dependable, physical big with clear NBA rotation potential.
NBA Comparison: Tom Gugliotta
18. Oklahoma City Thunder (via Philadelphia) – Meleek Thomas
6’5”, 185, PG/SG, Arkansas, Fr.
Stats (23 GP): 15.0 PPG, 3.4 RPG, 2.7 APG, 42.2 FG%, 39.1 3P%, 84.2 FT%
Thomas has established himself as a natural scorer, bringing a unique blend of pace, craft, and shot-making that makes him difficult to contain. His herky-jerky style keeps defenders off balance, using hesitation moves, sudden bursts, and long, slippery strides to create separation off the dribble. A smooth and confident perimeter shooter, he is knocking down nearly 40 percent from three while converting over 84 percent at the line, reinforcing the long-term value of his scoring profile. His ability to change speeds allows him to attack angles, get downhill, or rise comfortably into pull-ups, giving him multiple ways to generate offense within the flow.
At 6’5”, Thomas has adequate size but projects more as a combo guard than a true lead, and adding strength will be important to better absorb contact and handle physical defenders. He is somewhat undersized for a full-time two-guard role, but his scoring instincts, shooting touch, and quickness help offset those concerns. Defensively, he shows active hands and competitive energy, and he continues to flash secondary playmaking ability. With continued physical development and improved decision-making consistency, Thomas offers an intriguing offensive package and projects as a versatile scoring weapon capable of providing instant offense at the next level.
NBA Comparison: Leandro Barbosa / Jordan Hawkins
6’10”, 240, PF/C, Michigan, Sr.
Stats (23 GP): 14.3 PPG, 7.5 RPG, 3.2 APG, 50.5 FG%, 29.9 3P%, 84.5 FT%
Lendeborg remains one of the more unique and versatile senior bigs in the class, offering an uncommon blend of size, passing, and overall feel. After transferring from UAB to Michigan, his scoring production has dipped against stronger competition, but his all-around impact and connective skill set continue to stand out. Comfortable operating from the elbows and short roll, he makes quick reads, facilitates offense, and keeps the ball moving. His ability to rebound, handle in space, and contribute across multiple statistical categories gives him value beyond traditional frontcourt scoring and reflects a modern, high-IQ style of play.
The evaluation is somewhat mixed, as his feel and versatility are clear strengths, but his consistency, focus, and offensive assertiveness can fluctuate. His perimeter shooting remains a work in progress, and teams will want to see greater defensive reliability against NBA-level athletes. His age limits his long-term developmental upside, but it may appeal to teams seeking a more NBA-ready contributor who can step into a rotation sooner. With his physical maturity, experience, and passing instincts, Lendeborg projects as a versatile rotation big capable of facilitating offense and impacting the game in multiple ways if he brings steadier energy and improved shooting consistency.
NBA Comparison: Boris Diaw
20. Toronto Raptors – Cameron Carr
6’5”, 190, SG/SF, Tennessee, So.
Stats (23 GP): 19.6 PPG, 5.8 RPG, 2.8 APG, 52.1 FG%, 41.3 3P%, 76.8 FT%
Carr has put together one of the more impressive breakout seasons among returning wings, emerging as a primary option after previously being buried in a numbers crunch and limited by opportunity. Now playing a major role, he has responded with strong all-around production and efficiency, making a massive leap from just 4.6 points per game a year ago. An explosive, long-striding athlete, he pressures the rim effectively, finishes above the basket, and has made a significant jump as a perimeter shooter, converting over 41 percent from three. The shooting improvement appears driven more by rhythm, confidence, and expanded opportunity than mechanical changes, as the touch and form were always evident.
There will be some concern that his development took time at the college level, raising questions about how quickly his game will translate to the NBA. While he does not consistently take over every game, the flashes of high-level impact are difficult to ignore. Defensively, his length, mobility, and timing give him strong upside guarding multiple positions, and his overall athletic profile fits the mold of a high-upside tools wing. If the perimeter shooting holds and his offensive consistency continues to improve, Carr has one of the faster-rising trajectories among college wings, with a blend of athleticism, defensive potential, and scoring growth that points to legitimate two-way starter upside.
NBA Comparison: Kevin Martin / Nique Clifford
21. Minnesota Timberwolves – Bennett Stirtz
6’4”, 180, PG/SG, Iowa, Sr.
Stats (23 GP): 19.9 PPG, 2.3 RPG, 4.8 APG, 50.7 FG%, 40.6 3P%, 84.2 FT%
Stirtz has carried his production seamlessly from Drake to the Big Ten, posting nearly identical numbers despite the significant jump in competition. Averaging nearly 20 points per game while shooting over 40 percent from three, he has proven that his efficiency, decision-making, and offensive control translate against high-major defenses. He plays with excellent pace and composure, rarely forcing the action while consistently making the right read and keeping the offense organized. His compact shooting stroke, efficiency from all three levels, and steady ball security give him a strong profile as a polished, complementary guard who can both score and facilitate.
Defensively, Stirtz competes with toughness and discipline, relying on anticipation and positioning to compensate for average lateral quickness and athleticism. His experience shows in his screen navigation and ability to stay within team concepts. While his age and lack of elite burst limit his long-term upside and the adjustment to NBA speed at the guard position may take time, his readiness and proven production against high-level competition make him an appealing option for teams seeking early contribution. With his feel, shooting, and steady floor presence, Stirtz projects as a dependable rotation guard capable of organizing an offense and providing immediate value.
NBA Comparison: Steve Blake
6’5”, 215, SG/SF, Baylor, Fr.
Stats (23 GP): 17.7 PPG, 5.7 RPG, 1.7 APG, 47.8 FG%, 30.8 3P%, 76.2 FT%
Yessoufou has produced a strong freshman campaign built on physicality, toughness, and a relentless motor. One of the most physically mature perimeter players in the class, he consistently pressures defenses by attacking downhill, finishing through contact, and generating paint touches with strength and explosiveness. He plays with an aggressive, high-energy style that translates to transition scoring, rebounding from the wing, and steady two-way impact. Defensively, his strength, lateral quickness, and intensity allow him to guard multiple positions, disrupt ball handlers, and create turnovers, reflected in his 2.1 steals per game.
While the production has been solid, his long-term offensive ceiling remains tied to perimeter development. His 30.8 percent from three reinforces ongoing questions about shooting consistency, and improving his reliability from deep will be key to opening driving lanes at the next level. Because he is already physically advanced, some evaluators question how much additional upside remains compared to other freshmen. Even so, Yessoufou’s defensive edge, competitive nature, and ability to impact the game without plays called for him give him a clear path to early contribution. With incremental shooting improvement and continued skill refinement, he projects as a rugged, high-energy two-way wing capable of helping teams through defense, physicality, and downhill pressure.
NBA Comparison: Luguentz Dort / Avery Bradley
23. Los Angeles Lakers – Karim Lopez
6’8”, 205, SF, Mexico, Intl. (New Zealand Breakers – NBL)
Stats (29 GP): 11.8 PPG, 6.1 RPG, 1.9 APG, 1.2 SPG, 1.1 BPG, 50.0 FG%, 31.5 3P%, 73.8 FT%
Lopez has emerged as one of the more intriguing international wing/forward prospects, offering a rare combination of size, fluid shooting mechanics, and two-way statistical production in Australia’s NBL. Physically, he resembles a bigger Klay Thompson-type frame with good length and smooth perimeter movement. While his three-point percentage sits at just over 31 percent this season, the mechanics, touch, and confidence in his stroke suggest better long-term shooting potential, especially with NBA spacing. He contributes across the box score with rebounding, defensive activity, and efficient interior scoring, showing a well-rounded foundation for a young perimeter player competing against professionals.
The evaluation hinges on consistency, defensive edge, and overall impact level. Lopez was somewhat underwhelming at the 2025 adidas Eurocamp, where his performance fluctuated, though he flashed the elite shooting ability that keeps scouts intrigued. He currently lacks the defensive toughness and physical presence associated with top two-way wings, and teams will want to see him bring a more consistent motor and competitive edge. Considered a potential first-round talent, his combination of size and shooting gives him clear value, but the key will be proving he can put all the pieces together and contribute without requiring a lengthy developmental runway.
6’10”, 250, PF/C Kentucky, So.
Stats (4 GP): 5.0 PPG, 5.0 RPG, 0.5 APG, 57.1 FG%, 0.0 3P%, 30.8 FT%
Quaintance is one of the more physically gifted frontcourt prospects in the class, bringing strength, explosiveness, and a high motor to the interior. A transfer from Arizona State who was not draft-eligible as a freshman, he entered the season with significant buzz but has struggled to stay on the floor due to injuries and limited availability. When healthy, his physical upside is evident. He plays above the rim, looks to finish everything with force, and impacts the game through energy, rebounding, and defensive activity. His tools, frame, and athleticism give him the foundation of a modern role-playing big who can run the floor, protect the paint, and provide physical presence.
Offensively, Quaintance remains a work in progress. While he shows occasional touch around the basket, his scoring skill level is still developing, and his limited range and free throw struggles highlight the need for continued refinement. His long-term value projects more around defense, rebounding, and finishing within a defined role rather than offensive creation. Despite early hype that placed him in the top-10 conversation, his current trajectory points more toward the late first-round range. With his physical tools and defensive potential, he fits the mold of a Kevon Looney-type contributor at the next level, capable of impacting games through toughness, interior defense, and effort while continuing to develop his offensive feel.
NBA Comparison: Kevon Looney
6’5”, 190, PG/SG, Australia, Intl.
Stats (2025–26 NBL): 4.4 PPG, 2.3 RPG, 0.8 APG, 0.7 SPG in 14.5 MPG, 40.7 FG%, 36.0 3P%, 50.0 FT%
Daniels is an athletic, fluid two-way guard whose defensive competitiveness, length, and intensity give him a strong foundation as a perimeter stopper. Earning rotation minutes as an 18-year-old in the NBL has presented a steep developmental curve, but he has handled the physicality and pace of the professional level well while showing encouraging flashes. He moves naturally on the perimeter, slides well in space, and uses his length and anticipation to pressure ball handlers, disrupt passing lanes, and guard multiple positions. His physicality and poise against high-level competition were evident in a 2025 preseason exhibition against the New Orleans Pelicans, where he recorded 11 points and 6 rebounds and drew positive reviews from scouts.
Offensively, Daniels shows slashing ability and secondary playmaking instincts, attacking closeouts with long strides and operating comfortably in the midrange. His 36 percent three-point shooting is a promising sign, though the overall efficiency and 50 percent free throw mark point to the need for continued shooting development and mechanical consistency. The limited statistical production reflects both his age and role rather than a lack of tools, and the experience of playing against grown professionals should accelerate his growth curve. He also benefits from the developmental blueprint of older brother Dyson Daniels, whose NBA success has reinforced confidence in his long-term trajectory. With his defensive tools, motor, and positional versatility, Daniels carries a high floor as a two-way connector, with upside to become a valuable perimeter defender if his offensive game continues to progress.
NBA Comparison: Thabo Sefolosha
7’0”, 225, C, North Carolina, Jr.
Stats (23 GP): 16.6 PPG, 9.1 RPG, 2.0 APG, 1.3 BPG, 0.6 SPG, 62.6 FG%, 46.0 3P%, 62.1 FT%
Veesaar, a transfer from Arizona, has put together a highly efficient junior season while expanding his offensive versatility and overall impact. At 6’11”, he brings good mobility and feel, finishing efficiently inside while also emerging as a legitimate floor-spacing threat. His 62.6 percent field-goal mark reflects excellent shot selection and touch around the basket, while his 46 percent from three has added a valuable inside-out dimension to his offensive profile. He rebounds consistently, runs the floor well, and contributes as a connective passer, allowing him to operate comfortably within the flow of the offense.
Not an explosive leaper, Veesaar relies on skill, positioning, and awareness rather than vertical pop. Defensively, he provides solid rim protection and competes effectively on the glass, though continued strength development will help him hold ground against more physical interior players. His free throw percentage indicates some long-term shooting variability, but the combination of size, mobility, efficiency, and perimeter touch makes him an intriguing modern big. With his team-oriented approach and expanding skill set, Veesaar projects as a stretch center who can space the floor, rebound, protect the rim, and facilitate within a structured system.
NBA Comparison: Kelly Olynyk
27. Denver Nuggets – JT Toppin
6’8”, 225, PF/C, Texas Tech, Jr.
Stats (22 GP): 21.8 PPG, 10.5 RPG, 2.0 APG, 1.6 BPG, 1.3 SPG, 55.1 FG%, 27.5 3P%, 54.3 FT%
Toppin has been one of the most productive and impactful frontcourt players in the country, averaging nearly 22 points and over 10 rebounds while anchoring Texas Tech with his energy, athleticism, and relentless motor. At 6’8”, he consistently plays bigger than his size, using elite vertical pop, strength, and timing to dominate the glass and finish above the rim. Much of his offense comes from high-efficiency opportunities—alley-oops, putbacks, transition finishes, and interior work—but he has also shown improved comfort scoring on the block. He fills the stat sheet in multiple ways, adding 1.6 blocks and 1.3 steals per game, reflecting his activity level and defensive impact.
Perimeter development remains the key swing factor. His three-point percentage shows gradual progress, but his 54 percent free throw mark raises concerns about long-term shooting consistency, even though he shot significantly better (67 percent) last season, suggesting some volatility. Defensively, his motor, rebounding, and ability to generate both blocks and steals give him real value, though managing fouls and tightening decision-making will be important. At 22 on draft night, his age limits his developmental runway, but his athleticism, toughness, and high-level production give him a clear path as a high-energy rotation big who impacts games through effort, physicality, and interior presence.
NBA Comparison: Kenneth Faried
28. San Antonio Spurs – Koa Peat
6’8”, 235, PF, Arizona, Fr.
Stats (24 GP): 14.3 PPG, 5.6 RPG, 2.6 APG, 54.2 FG%, 33.3 3P%, 61.0 FT%
Peat has delivered a productive freshman season built around strength, skill, and physical maturity, showing the polish and interior feel that made him one of the most accomplished high school players in recent Arizona history. A key contributor to Arizona’s undefeated start, he has provided steady scoring, toughness, and reliability on both ends. At 6’8”, 235 pounds, he uses his powerful frame, balance, and advanced footwork to establish position, finish efficiently around the basket, and play through contact. His passing out of the post and comfort operating as a scorer or facilitator inside the arc remain valuable strengths, and his high-IQ, team-first approach consistently impacts winning.
The long-term projection becomes more complex when evaluating his shooting and overall offensive ceiling. His three-point percentage has been respectable but on modest volume, and a 61 percent free throw mark points to ongoing questions about perimeter consistency. Without elite length or explosiveness for an NBA power forward, developing more reliable spacing value will be important. His game currently leans heavily on physicality, and there are questions about how well that style will translate against bigger, longer, and more athletic frontcourts. Those factors temper his upside as a high first-round prospect, but in the late first-round range, his toughness, feel, and inside-the-arc productivity project well as a sturdy rotation forward if his shooting and offensive range continue to develop.
NBA Comparison: Chuck Hayes / Trevor Booker
29. Detroit Pistons – Allen Graves
6’9”, 225, SF/PF, Santa Clara, Fr.
Stats (26 GP): 11.2 PPG, 7.1 RPG, 1.8 APG, 1.0 BPG, 2.1 SPG, 51.4 FG%, 39.3 3P%, 69.6 FT%
Graves has emerged as a legitimate first-round dark horse, producing strong two-way numbers despite playing in a mid-major setting with modest usage. The analytics stand out, as he averages over a three-pointer, a block, and more than two steals per game, reflecting rare defensive activity and versatility for a 6’9” forward. A former point guard, he brings advanced feel, ball handling, and passing instincts for his size, allowing him to function as a connective piece offensively rather than a pure finisher. His length, anticipation, and mobility show up on the defensive end, where he impacts the game across multiple areas and profiles as a disruptive multi-positional defender.
Physically, Graves still has room to refine his body and improve his scoring assertiveness, but the foundation of size, efficiency, defensive production, and feel is highly intriguing. A move to a high-major program next season could push him into lottery consideration for 2027, but his current trajectory already gives him a chance to hear his name called in the mid-to-late first round this year. The decision may ultimately come down to timing, as teams value his versatility, instincts, and ability to impact winning without needing high usage.
NBA Comparison: Boris Diaw / Kyle Anderson
30. Dallas Mavericks (via OKC Thunder) – Miikka Muurinen
6’11”, 210, PF/C, Finland, Intl. (Partizan Belgrade)
Stats: 4.1 PPG, 2.9 RPG, 1.0 APG, 1.0 SPG, 0.4 BPG
Muurinen is a high-upside international forward whose combination of size, fluid athleticism, and perimeter skill potential continues to intrigue scouts, even as his role with Partizan has been limited. He has struggled to earn consistent minutes at the professional level, but prior to turning pro he was a highly rated American high school prospect at AZ Compass Prep, where he flashed extreme athleticism and open-floor ability. At 6’11”, he moves exceptionally well, showing grab-and-go potential, the ability to attack closeouts, and the athletic tools to finish above the rim. His shooting mechanics are soft and projectable, and defensively his length and mobility give him the versatility to switch and cover ground.
The key questions center on strength, maturity, and consistency. Muurinen still needs to add physicality to handle contact, and his development will depend on improving focus, day-to-day habits, and overall professionalism. At this stage, he must evolve from a spectacular highlight-maker into a disciplined, reliable team player who impacts the game consistently rather than in flashes. Given his tools and athletic profile, he remains an intriguing upside bet, but he projects as a longer-term developmental prospect who will require patience as he continues to mature both on and off the floor.
NBA Comparison: Andris Biedrins / Darko Milicic
About the Author
